Pranav Jani investigates the long history of police violence in Columbus, Ohio, in the wake of the killing of Tyre King. This article is based on a speech Jani, a member of the International Socialist Organization and the Ohio State University Coalition for Black Liberation, gave at a teach-in at the university this past summer.
Read the full article here.
We need to drastically change the racist perception of Black people and people of color as threats in this city. We need to change the way that police shootings and misconduct are investigated internally and--as the People's Justice Project states--we need a "reinvestment of public resources from overly aggressive police tactics to proactive strategies–like restorative justice and trauma recovery–proven to work in partnership with our communities to make them safer for all."
Last night, a cop with the Columbus Police Department shot and killed 13-year-old Tyre King, in yet another case of racist police murder in the Near East Side. Tyre was at least the third Black person to be murdered by Columbus police this summer alone, after the murders of Kawme Patrick, age 25, on June 30, and Henry Green V, age 23, on June 6.
Tyre was one of the youngest children to be murdered by police in the country since the murder of Tamir Rice in Cleveland nearly two years ago. Now, the Columbus Police Department is returning to the same racist tactics of victim-blaming used against Tamir and his family to justify the murder of this child.
They blame Tyre for his own death, on account of his having a toy gun, conveniently ignoring the fact that police across the country have regularly arrested white aggressors armed with real guns without resorting to deadly violence. We must recognize that the blame in this case falls squarely on the shoulders of the racist Columbus Police Department, which as the Columbus Free Press reported last year, has the second-highest per-capita rate of police shootings in the country, behind only Las Vegas.
In a press conference this morning, mayor Andrew Ginther stated his “thoughts and prayers” are with the King family, but the Ginther administration and city council share responsibility for Tyre’s death. Their policies of gentrifying the Near East Side, over-policing Black residents, and giving CPD ever-greater funding while cutting desperately needed services, created the context for this murder to happen.
Though they give lip-service to supporting better “community-police relations,” Ginther and city council have consistently blocked even modest efforts to address police violence, such as the creation of a Civilian Review Board. The fact that they have dedicated one-third of the city budget to police, while nearly 18% of Columbus residents live below the poverty line, makes their actual priorities clear.
We must reject the false promises of politicians and the racist lies of the media. Columbus Police Chief Jacobs today has called for “calm” pending an “investigation,” but we know that justice will not wait. Real justice can come only through the organized struggle of ordinary, working class people. We express our full solidarity with the King family, and we will continue to work alongside many others to build a movement that can end police terrorism in Columbus -- once and for all.
Jail killer cops! Justice for Tyre King!
Over the last few years, both nationally and internationally, there has been growing awareness about sexual assault within the Left and the determination of survivors and their supporters to speak. The International Socialist Organization, as a national organization, has considered this to be a pressing question for our movement. Recent events in Columbus and sharp debates among activists about the way forward has prompted us in ISO-Columbus to write this statement about our approach to combating the problem. While we stand firmly behind the statement and the principles behind it, we invite dialogue in the Columbus Left and beyond so we can all do better to eradicate sexual assault and rape culture from within social justice movements.
After learning of allegations of sexual violence and abuse of power by one of the main organizers of the Bend the Bars Convergence, ISO members and other activists initiated dialogue with the organizers involved in the Convergence to learn more about the situation, and to support the accuser’s request to us and to others that the accused activist step down from their position of leadership until a process of accountability had been completed.
We know through individual conversations with the organizers of the Convergence that they took these accusations seriously and conducted their own investigations when they were brought to light. However, we also believe it was a mistake not to take the additional step of asking the organizer accused of such serious misconduct to step aside from their position in the conference, pending a more formal accountability process, which is still yet to take place.
We believe a policy of “temporary suspension without assumption of guilt,” whenever there are accusations of sexual assault in the activist community, is a necessary step toward protecting the accuser and other potential victims from further harm and potential marginalization in our movements. It is also necessary because it provides a public demonstration of the seriousness with which activists handle such accusations, and therefore protects the integrity of our organizing and educational spaces.
While there will always be some chance that we are temporarily suspending an activist who is innocent, we do not believe any specific event or coalition is so important that the suspension of one individual from it should be of greater worry than the very real chance that the accused represents an ongoing threat to our community. Likewise, failing to take accusations of sexual assault seriously will create the perception that our movements regard sexual assault as a secondary matter only to be addressed when organizing is complete. Such a stance is incompatible with any conception of social justice worthy of the name.
Temporary suspension from organizing without assumption of guilt is not a punishment, nor is it a violation of the basic principle of due process. Instead, it is a necessary safeguard to ensure that a thorough accountability process will occur within the community affected, and that survivors can safely continue to participate in organizing if they desire to do so in the meantime. To not take this step of temporarily suspending the accused could in effect suspend survivors from participating.
Given that police infiltrators have both used accusations of sexual assault and, more frequently, actually committed sexual assault to weaken movements in the past, due process following a suspension may give us an opportunity to uncover these political machinations. Given also that racism has historically factored into who gets accused and who does not, we must take due process seriously to guard against biased claims. And yet, we know from research that in the vast majority of cases such accusations are not made lightly. Indeed, it also has been documented that an effect of rape culture is that victims are much, much more likely to remain silent out of fear of others not believing them or blaming them, and that false accusations are exceptionally rare.
We cannot simply wait to deal with these issues or to take action until the relevant activists or organizations have created and agreed upon full models for accountability and restorative justice. While we are supportive of efforts to create a process of accountability where those accused can receive some form of due process and perhaps even of rehabilitative programming (when possible and desired by the survivor), deciding what this process will consist of should follow the immediate action of suspending the accused from their organizing roles.
We have to be very sober about where we are as a community. It would be incredible if the entire activist community could come together and design a common set of principles and procedures--binding for all activists--for addressing accusations of sexual assault within our ranks. But we believe we are very far from such a situation in Columbus. In our present circumstance, it goes against every principle of social justice organizing to let an accused or self-admitted perpetrator of sexual violence continue on as if nothing happened -- while the survivor and others are told to wait for an alternative to emerge.
We hope that this practice of temporary suspension without assumption of guilt will become the norm on the Left in general, because we believe it is necessary to protect survivors, and it will create more urgency around hearing and resolving accusations of misconduct when they arise. Too often these accusations are met with silence and inaction, and we must do better.